Recent Articles | About Authors | About the Syndicate | Archives

To receive a plain text copy of this article by email, see info at the bottom of this page.

Real Answers™
sh58
Copyright: © 2010 Shaunna Howat
800 words

CARTOON NONSENSE:  NON SEQUITUR BEGS A QUESTION

By: Shaunna Howat

As fallacies go, non sequiturs are pretty well-known. This fallacy, which literally means “does not follow,” leaps from premise to conclusion without substantiation. Thus we draw a conclusion that does not follow from the above premises.

One popular logic textbook by James Nance and Douglas Wilson offers the following example: “God is love. Love is blind. Ray Charles is blind. Therefore, Ray Charles is God.” Though perhaps the form of the syllogism looks valid, the conclusion cannot be drawn from these premises.

Here’s a real-life example: This December on the popular social network FaceBook, members encourage one another to replace their profile picture with a picture of their favorite cartoon character. “Change your profile picture to a cartoon character from your childhood and invite your friends to do the same. Until Monday (Dec 6) there should be no human faces on FaceBook, but an invasion of memories. This is a campaign to stop violence against children.”

Not only is this a non sequitur, it also evinces a fallacy called “Begging the Question,” or petitio principii. Putting a cartoon character in my FaceBook profile picture, joining the masses who follow suit, will stop violence against children? Another faulty logical maneuver is implication: by NOT changing my profile picture to a cartoon character, I have (gasp!) said I condone violence against children.

Before you accuse me of popping that wonderful little red balloon Love Bear holds in his sweet, fuzzy paw, think carefully how lemmings on a social website will end violence against children by changing their profile picture. It makes me wonder whether I could begin a new campaign to bring the moon closer to earth if we change our profile picture to our favorite snack food. It does not follow!

Remember those chain mail letters you got when you were younger (back before email took over and we were inundated with similar missives promising $50,000 to everyone who added their name to the email and sent it on)? If we just sent out ten letters to friends, then we’d receive some sort of promised benefit. If we broke the chain, bad luck would soon follow.

Even as a child, I knew that was a bunch of hot air and waste of good money on stamps. It was superstitious nonsense. Yet here we are, on the internet, still purveying the same silliness. Solomon was right: “There’s nothing new under the sun.”

It simply does not follow. No social change will arise from posting a favorite cartoon character, not even if 350,000 of my closest friends do the same. “But,” someone argued when a friend bravely questioned the fad, “we need to consider those less fortunate than ourselves and do something! Raising awareness of an important issue prompts some people to take action. Some may adopt a better parenting style. Others may support an organization that supports kids in distress.”

Really? Changing your profile picture, will bring this about? My friend defined the real meat of this fallacy:

What will REALLY help __________? (Insert whatever cause you want to 'raise awareness' of.) Is it a color of ribbon that I wear? or changing a picture on a public forum? Those things smack of blowing my own horn for my self-righteousness --- to my glory, not to God's. I need to speak the Law (to convict people of sin) and the Gospel (to tell of Christ's atoning work on the cross to pay for and forgive sin). That is the ONLY thing that will not only change people's bad behavior, but give eternal hope and peace with God to both the abused and the abuser.

I agree that there are actions to be taken, love to show, money to be raised, but in the end, the One who will change this world won't be me.

Truly, what produces social change? Not some action of my own devising, but the saving act of Jesus Christ. Not some new program by government or church, but the Gospel. It is my great joy in the knowledge of my salvation—unearned through no act of mine but solely through the grace of God—that compels me to step outside and help others, carrying out the Great Commission.

Lest you lament that I’ve leapt off the deep end searching for profound meaning in a cartoon character, remember that following a trend such as this is just that: a trend, not a promise to end world hunger or AIDS or violence against children. It has no meaning; it is mere symbol.

Change your FaceBook profile picture—go ahead! Just don’t try to tell yourself your act is doing anything but making people smile when they associate a cartoon character with your name. It just does not follow that this will cause great social change in this world.

Shaunna Howat is the author of high school curriculum Biblical Worldview Rhetoric 1 and 2 and teaches Rhetoric and worldviews classes at The Potter’s School, an internet-based classroom. She serves with The Potter’s School as Academic Coordinator as well. She blogs at http://writingrhetorically.com.

"Real Answers™" furnished courtesy of The Amy Foundation Internet Syndicate. To contact the author or The Amy Foundation, write or E-mail to: P. O. Box 16091, Lansing, MI 48901-6091; amyfoundtn@aol.com

Request this article:
To instantly receive a plain text copy of this article by email, enter your publication title, city and state, and email address, then retype the article number (shown in bold below). Then click the "Send It" button once.
Fields marked (*) are required

back to top